| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jules Bean <jules(at)jellybean(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance on inserts |
| Date: | 2000-10-15 21:37:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200010152137.RAA15517@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > What is the status of
> > partial indices? Are they functional now, or have they been broken
> > forever (I'm not recalling)?
>
> They've been diked out of gram.y's syntax for CREATE INDEX at least
> since Postgres95. No way to tell who did that, why or when, AFAIK.
> There is still an awful lot of support code for them, however.
It may have been me. Not sure. At the time, no one was sure what they
did, or if we even wanted them. They were broken, I think.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-15 21:44:52 | Re: Performance on inserts |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-10-15 20:01:05 | Ответ: [HACKERS] WAL status & todo |