Re: Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "David R(dot) Favor" <dfavor(at)austin(dot)ibm(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h
Date: 2000-10-10 22:47:15
Message-ID: 20001010154715.A620@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:37:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > But perhaps it is ecpg's fault for including "elog.h".
> > IMHO these defines should never leave the database kernel.
> ...
> Yes, leaking into user programs is a bad practice. Is there a
> solution/patch for that?

Hmm, I haven't check carefully, but I don't think ecpg include elog.h
directly. Maybe I just picked the wrong file to include.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-10 22:54:14 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-10 22:24:01 Re: [PATCHES] CLASSOID patch