Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Date: 2000-10-09 23:22:13
Message-ID: 200010092322.TAA24863@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > hrmm .. mvcc uses a timestamp, no? is there no way of using that
> > timestamp to determine which columns have/haven't been cleaned up
> > following a crash? maybe some way of marking a table as being in a 'drop
> > column' mode, so that when it gets brought back up again, it is scan'd for
> > any tuples older then that date?
>
> WAL would provide the framework to do something like that, but I still
> say it'd be a bad idea. What you're describing is
> irrevocable-once-it-starts DROP COLUMN; there is no way to roll it back.
> We're trying to get rid of statements that act that way, not add more.
>
> I am not convinced that a 2x penalty for DROP COLUMN is such a huge
> problem that we should give up all the normal safety features of SQL
> in order to avoid it. Seems to me that DROP COLUMN is only a big issue
> during DB development, when you're usually working with relatively small
> amounts of test data anyway.
>

Bingo!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-10-09 23:27:32 Re: foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 23:17:35 Re: Announcing PgSQL - a Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to PostgreSQL