Re: Status of new relation file naming

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-12 16:31:44
Message-ID: 200009121631.MAA25932@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> Where are we in subj?
> Oid.version or UniqueId?
> If noone is going to implement it soon then I'll have to
> change code to OID file naming for WAL.

Well, we can move to one of these, but we need tools so people can find
the real table names that go with the files, and even then, it will
never be as good as the system we currently have.

My idea was to append a version number or oid on to the end of the file
name, and use that somehow.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-12 16:39:04 Re: Weird function behavior from Sept 11 snapshot
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-09-12 16:12:03 Status of new relation file naming