| From: | Louis-David Mitterrand <cunctator(at)apartia(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OID decreasing? |
| Date: | 2000-08-18 06:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20000818085135.A1401@styx |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 09:23:43AM +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> I'm totally guessing here, but sometimes databases use a scheme where
> each backend process grabs a chunk of oids for its own use to avoid
> process contention on this single resource. Were they created with
> multiple connections?
Right on! There were indeed created through Apache::DBI. Thanks for your
input.
> Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > In this table one can see that OID 178502 was created after OID 178593.
> > Is this normal behaviour? I thought that OID sequences kept going up.
--
Louis-David Mitterrand - ldm(at)apartia(dot)org - http://www.apartia.org
> Any suggestions for setting up WinCVS client + (server) on NT4?
Run away screaming in terror.
--Toby.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Clark L. Naldoza | 2000-08-18 07:30:08 | Re: [GENERAL] I screwed it up, my installation :( |
| Previous Message | Carl Alexander | 2000-08-18 06:49:08 | New user question -- alternate programmer interfaces? |