From: | JanWieck(at)t-online(dot)de (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)kick(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Foreign key bugs (Re: [BUGS] "New" bug?? Serious - crashesbackend.) |
Date: | 2000-07-11 19:42:26 |
Message-ID: | 200007111942.VAA19571@hot.jw.home |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> Also, I realized something else that is a little wierd. When a temporary
> table shadows a permanent table that you've made a foreign key reference
> to, which table should it be going to check the constraint?
>
Outch - that hurts. Haven't checked it yet, but from what I
have in memory it should be a possibility to violate
constraints.
Damned.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-07-11 20:44:05 | Re: Foreign key bugs + other problems |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2000-07-11 19:24:13 | Re: Foreign key bugs (Re: [BUGS] "New" bug?? Serious - crashesbackend.) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-07-11 20:34:21 | Re: Templates |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-11 19:33:08 | Re: update on TOAST status' |