| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: more corruption |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 22:38:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200007102238.SAA04618@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Given Vadim's plans for WAL and smgr changes, at least the next two
> version updates likely won't be updatable with pg_upgrade anyway.
> However, we've seen a couple of times recently when pg_upgrade was
> useful as a recovery tool for system-table corruption, and that's why
> I'm unhappy about the prospect of just discarding it...
Agreed. I can see some cases where several types of recovery will be
harder in the new system.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 22:39:21 | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-07-10 22:35:58 | Re: pg_backup symlink? |