Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date: 2000-07-10 00:37:46
Message-ID: 200007100037.UAA04258@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Louis Bertrand wrote:
> >
> > There's a benchmark/review comparing PostgreSQL and MySQL on PHP Builder:
> > http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20000705.php3
>
> I'm wondering about the comments that postgres is slower in connection
> time, could this be related to that libpq always uses asynchronous
> sockets to connect? It always turns off blocking and then goes through a
> state machine to go through the various stages of connect, instead of
> just calling connect() and waiting for the kernel to do its thing. Of
> course asynchronous connecting is a benefit when you want it. Or is the
> overhead elsewhere, and I'm just being paranoid?

The truth is, we really don't know what it is.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-10 02:24:59 Announce: Testers needed for pg_dump with BLOB support.
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-10 00:28:04 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-10 00:38:30 Re: Re: C language function dump problem
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-07-10 00:28:04 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL