Re: Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license

From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Announce <pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license
Date: 2000-07-04 06:19:34
Message-ID: 20000704081934.K35215@daemon.ninth-circle.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

-On [20000704 08:00], Thomas Lockhart (lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu) wrote:
>> I think this is a bad idea for the following reasons:
>> 1) It is trying to be a GPL in what it is trying to achieve without
>> actually being well thought out. Any person who "submits" modifications
>> must do so under the same licence. Submits to what or whom?
>
>It is *not* trying to be GPL. It is trying to be BSD, while extending
>liability protection to the current cast of developers, who are (I'm
>pretty sure) not covered in any of the wording of the UCB-generated
>license.

* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.

Seems pretty clear to me. ``In no event shall the author or
contributors be liable for any...''

Anyways, why do people always have to start whole threads on -announce?
Reply-to set. Please honour it.

--
Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)[wxs(dot)nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org]
Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best
The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>
Malam bulan dipagar bintang makin indah jika dipandang bagai gadis beri
senyuman pada bujang idaman...

In response to

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-04 07:23:28 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-04 06:11:25 Re: Installing DBD::Pg

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-04 06:48:20 Re: psql dumps core
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-07-04 06:11:25 Re: Installing DBD::Pg

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-07-04 06:38:26 heap_create with OID?
Previous Message anuj 2000-07-04 05:43:59 linking error