Re: boolean isn't boolean?

From: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: boolean isn't boolean?
Date: 2000-06-24 19:30:08
Message-ID: 20000624143008.B13924@rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:29:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Thomas Lockhart writes:
> >
> > > Do you have a reference for an SQL99 document? Preferably on-line or in
> > > a form similar to what we've found for SQL3-1999?
> >
> > ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/ansi-iso-9075-[12345]-1999.txt
> >
> > This seems to be the real copyrighted deal, so get yours while it's there.
>
> Seems we need an ANSI SQL napster server. :-)

Hmm, the README at that site says:

----
This is the primary server for the /isowg directory. A mirror site
is available at math0.math.ecu.edu. math0.math.ecu.edu is updated
twice a day.
----

So, it looks like it's the offical repository for (at least) the US part
of the iso working groups. Traditionally, those docs have been freely
available until the standard is actually accepted. Perhaps these are
working drafts for the next version? OR someone slipped up, and forgot
to remove them when the standard was voted on? Is the voting done? Has
ANSI voted? Will Lassie find Jimmy in the well?

Ross
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert J. Sprawls 2000-06-24 21:15:28 Re: MySQL Command Comparison
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-24 16:29:14 Re: boolean isn't boolean?