Re: followup to SELECT/INSERT problem

From: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: followup to SELECT/INSERT problem
Date: 2000-06-23 17:54:16
Message-ID: 20000623135415.J24735@reptiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 12:00:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> writes:
> > it appears that each call to UPDATE seems to be taking a long, long time to
> > complete.
>
> Poor choice of plan, maybe? What does EXPLAIN say about how a typical
> example of the UPDATE will be executed?

silly me, i should have know to do more investigation before going to the list.

as it turns out, the index on the key was not being used.

a "vacuum verbose analyze" caused things to run much, much faster.
(hence the UPDATE ... WHERE key = ... was taking extra long)

--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ]
[ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-23 18:06:50 Re: Need to improve performance
Previous Message Vassili A Akimov 2000-06-23 17:43:52 Re: Need to improve performance