Re: int24_ops and int42_ops are bogus

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int24_ops and int42_ops are bogus
Date: 2000-06-19 00:54:37
Message-ID: 200006190054.UAA20814@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think we ought to assume that index manipulation deals with only
> one datatype for any given index, and therefore these two opclasses
> are broken by design and must be removed.

Agreed. They are weird.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-19 01:03:08 Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-19 00:54:00 Re: Big 7.1 open items