Re: Small bug with numeric in 7.0 (also in 6.5.3)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Raul Chirea <raul(at)brahms(dot)ro>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small bug with numeric in 7.0 (also in 6.5.3)
Date: 2000-06-13 07:41:19
Message-ID: 200006130741.DAA23492@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Any comments on this one?

> Raul Chirea <raul(at)brahms(dot)ro> writes:
> > So, it seems to be a parser difficulty (bug) to correctly determine
> > the type of a numeric constant with decimals (like 99.9).
>
> Yes. You can find more about this in the pgsql-hackers archives.
> We've been aware of the problem for a while but are unsure as yet
> how to solve it without breaking other cases --- ie, cases where
> you *do* want such a constant to be treated as float not numeric.
>
> For the moment, we have left the behavior as it's always been in
> Postgres (ie, undecorated non-integral constants are taken to be
> 'float8'), so as not to break existing applications.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-13 09:09:53 Re: jdbc2 bug in absolute (ResultSet.java)
Previous Message Jerome Alet 2000-06-13 07:20:26 Re: grant/revoke bug with delete/update