Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mike Wyer <mw(at)doc(dot)ic(dot)ac(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5
Date: 2000-06-13 07:36:01
Message-ID: 200006130736.DAA23290@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This was put in 7.1.

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Can someone comment on this patch? It looks good to me.
>
> Looks like a rather major rewrite of the Kerberos support --- do we feel
> comfortable cramming this into 7.0.1? Seems like putting it into the
> 7.1 cycle might be the prudent course, so that it will get some beta
> testing before being loosed upon the world. (Alternatively, if a couple
> other Kerberos users want to try it and report back, I'd feel better
> about dropping it into 7.0.* ...)
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-13 07:37:30 Re: Re: kerberos 5 patch against 7.0RC5
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-13 07:33:49 Re: \h behaviour - strange ?