| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE |
| Date: | 2000-06-12 15:58:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200006121558.LAA19769@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > Well, we clearly need ability to prevent table creation, and lock
> > > control is good too. Seems useful.
> >
> > Lock control needs to be per table, not user. Creation control needs to be
> > per database (eventually schema), not user.
> >
>
> We already tell about it, but yes, you are right too. But it is not
> implemented yet.
>
I am inclined to think it helps to have this configurable at the user
level too, but let's see what people come up with.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-06-12 16:00:29 | Re: Patch for better large objects support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-12 15:50:53 | Re: Patch for better large objects support |