| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, jutso(at)tpts5(dot)seed(dot)net(dot)tw, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in move 0 |
| Date: | 2000-06-11 03:56:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200006110356.XAA17239@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I just sent off an email stating that MOVE 0 goes to the end, and that
> > the FETCH manual page says:
>
> > Postgres does not currently support this notion; in
> > fact the value zero is reserved to indicate that
> > all rows should be retrieved and is equivalent to
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > specifying the ALL keyword. If the RELATIVE key-
> > word has been used, the Postgres assumes that the
> > user intended SQL92 behavior and returns this error
> > message.
>
> > So it seems we are OK.
>
> We may have documented the behavior, but that doesn't make it right ;-)
> If someone were to submit a patch to change MOVE 0 into a no-op
> (without breaking MOVE ALL of course), I'd vote to apply it.
If we do that, how does one move to the end of a cursor?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-11 05:01:00 | Re: Bug in move 0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-11 03:52:25 | Re: Bug in move 0 |