| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make_ctags script |
| Date: | 2000-06-09 12:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | 200006091219.IAA18100@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Slightly off topic: While going through the current source, comparing
> to Mariposa, I've seen little traces of old code: some ideas seem to
> have been reinvented and reimplemented a number of times. Going back
> and digging into Postgres95, and the last postquel based release,
> postgres-v4r2, to see how they were implemented, it's been fun seeing
> "debate/design by comment block" from some of the original university
> developers. In particular, one block with a 12 line NOOOOOO! in
> backend/commands/version.c had me rolling on the floor. Ah, I see it lives
> on in _deadcode. In general, the functional comments in the current code
> are more informative, but not as much fun ;-)
What I have realized is how superior some of our code is to the old
stuff.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-06-09 12:30:55 | RE: New Globe |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-09 12:12:52 | Re: Deferred trigger queue |