| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Date: | 2000-05-20 01:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200005200146.VAA25437@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> I wrote:
> > We should just need a switching layer in front of heap_beginscan/
> > index_beginscan and heap_getnext/index_getnext...)
>
> After refreshing my memory of how these are used, it seems that
> we'd have to change the API of either the heap or index scan routines
> in order to unify them like that. Might be worth doing to maintain
> code cleanliness, though. The places Hiroshi has fixed to support
> both index and seq scan look really ugly to my eyes ...
Agreed, and I think there are a few places that have them.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-20 01:53:28 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Paul Dlug | 2000-05-20 01:31:33 | Re: Zip Code Proximity |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-20 01:53:28 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-20 00:32:18 | Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server)) |