Re: Using substr with user defined types

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using substr with user defined types
Date: 2000-05-18 15:20:05
Message-ID: 200005181520.LAA19064@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> I'd like to see "opaque" eliminated from Postgres, because it's
> unhelpfully named and is used to cover several distinct purposes that
> would be better served with distinct names. Might create too much of
> a backwards compatibility problem though :-(

I was just thinking about that last night in relation to my book.
Opaque is a weird name.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-18 15:28:37 Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-18 15:00:47 Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index