From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using substr with user defined types |
Date: | 2000-05-18 15:20:05 |
Message-ID: | 200005181520.LAA19064@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> I'd like to see "opaque" eliminated from Postgres, because it's
> unhelpfully named and is used to cover several distinct purposes that
> would be better served with distinct names. Might create too much of
> a backwards compatibility problem though :-(
I was just thinking about that last night in relation to my book.
Opaque is a weird name.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-18 15:28:37 | Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-18 15:00:47 | Re: Re[2]: lower() for varchar data by creating an index |