Re: Performance

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
Cc: Charles Tassell <ctassell(at)isn(dot)net>, Diego Schvartzman <dschvar(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Lista PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance
Date: 2000-05-16 16:14:08
Message-ID: 20000516091407.I20000@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> # At 04:56 PM 5/15/00, Diego Schvartzman wrote:
> # >I have an application via PHP. For example, a SELECT query that must return
> # >one and only one row, with a where clause with and index (I droped it and
> # >created again) that took about 3 seconds (v6.5.3), now (v7.0.0) takes about
> # >15 seconds. Really I don't lnow what is happening. Same hardware, same php
> # >version, etc etc.
> # >

* Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> [000516 02:26] wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2000, Charles Tassell wrote:
>
> I ran into this exact problem, and it was *very* significant on a
> 15M row table I have. :) It didn't seem to want to use the index, even
> freshly created, without a vacuum analyze.

grrrr....

FOR THE LAST TIME, THESE BUG REPORTS ARE PRETTY MUCH **USELESS**
TO THE DEVELOPERS UNLESS YOU GIVE:

THE TABLE STRUCTURE,
THE QUERY, AND
THE OUTPUT OF 'EXPLAIN'

Just because someone is a database guru doesn't mean they are also
clairvoyant. :)

thanks,
-Alfred

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Diego Schvartzman 2000-05-16 16:15:35 Re: Performance
Previous Message Jeff Hoffmann 2000-05-16 15:47:38 Re: Question about databases in alternate locations...