Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Michael A(dot) Olson" <mao(at)sleepycat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)
Date: 2000-05-16 01:40:21
Message-ID: 200005160140.VAA04172@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Seems this changes our license more toward GPL. I don't think that is
> > going to be supportable by the group. I doubt we are willing to modify
> > our license in order to use the Sleepycat DB code.
>
> I don't know ... I read this as totally anti-GPL ... "you are more then
> welcome to distribute binary only, but then you have to pay us for use of
> our libraries" ...
>
> ... the only aspect that would worry me is if SleepCat were to change
> their license and make it more restrictive ...

But it ties the hands of binary-only distributors, or pay them. Not a
good choice.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-16 01:48:19 Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-16 01:39:39 Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)