Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joachim Achtzehnter <joachim(at)kraut(dot)bc(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 10:55:47
Message-ID: 200005021055.GAA07966@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> Today, in a message to Thomas Lockhart, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > I am unable to compile the java code with kaffe. Can anyone compile
> > > > jdbc under 7.0?
> >
> > However, it seems kaffe can't compile self-referencing java files. I
> > don't know enough about java to know that is a problem or not.
>
> Have not tried with 7.0, but recent versions of Kaffe were definitely able
> to compile the JDBC code that came with 6.5.3, but only after modifying
> the version check in the makeVersion.java file in src/interfaces/jdbc (and
> perhaps elsewhere where a versioon check occurs). The code checks for the
> java version string and rejects everything that doesn't start with either
> 1.1 or 1.2. The problem was that Kaffe reports its own version, e.g. 1.02,
> rather than the corresponding JDK version.

Interesting. It does compile under kaffe 1.05, but the mutually
dependent java files cause a compile error. Seems 6.5.3 had the same
problem, so I am not sure why it would have worked then.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-02 10:55:53 Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 10:54:01 Re: Update to FAQ_SCO.

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 11:01:04 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2000-05-02 09:24:07 Re: NOTICE: BeginTransactionBlock and not in default