Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas <englim(at)pc(dot)jaring(dot)my>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Date: 2000-04-14 17:24:39
Message-ID: 200004141724.NAA06979@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Vacuum collects stats on table size on every run. Vacuum analyze every
> > night is a waste unless the tables are really changing dramatically
> > every day.
>
> Agreed. My tables are changing dramatically every day under normal usage.
> Ideally, vacuuming would be auto-triggered after so many
> inserts/updates/deletes.

We have thought of that too. Some vacuum option that would do stats
only if X % of the table had changed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-14 17:27:50 Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-14 17:23:32 Re: Postgresqlism & Vacuum?