| From: | Olivier Galibert <galibert(at)xemacs(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Didier Verna <didier(at)xemacs(dot)org>, bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, XEmacs beta testers <xemacs-beta(at)xemacs(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
| Date: | 2000-04-10 18:22:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20000410142239.A1682@nemesis.ncsl.nist.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 01:45:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Offhand, if you do not put -I into your compile switches, I'd be
> somewhat surprised that either way would work for you. Certainly
> hardcoding a full path into application source code is a completely
> unportable way to do things...
Not when it's autoconf that does the hardcoding :-)
With the number of external librairies we use, the amount of -I was
becoming a bit too high for our tastes...
OG.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-04-10 19:15:58 | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |
| Previous Message | Didier Verna | 2000-04-10 18:07:05 | Re: #include oddity in v7.0b3 |