Re: [HACKERS] Doc updates

* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [000407 22:35] wrote:
> > Do these need to be mentioned?
> >
> > > New multibyte encodings
> >
> > I assume README.mb talks about these.
> >
> >
> >
> > Bottom line: Peter gets an A, the rest of us have work to do...
>
> Totally agree about Peter.
>
> We were much better this time about getting doc updates with patches.
> However, we do clearly have work to do. If we let it slide, we will
> never come back to it later, I fear.
>
> OK, people, you have Tom Lane's hard work here. Get cracking. I will
> apply doc fixes as fast as I get them.

Has any progress been made regarding splitting the online docs based
on release so there's a snapshot of the docs made at the time of
the 7.0 release and a seperate space for upcoming versions clearly
marked so users are aware of what's actually in the release versus
what's in development?

thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."