| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY |
| Date: | 2000-04-06 16:20:33 |
| Message-ID: | 200004061620.MAA22497@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 11:38:10AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables. Should I show examples
> > > > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
> > >
> > > TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not. Nuff said...
> >
> > OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?
>
> Seems to work in 6.5.0, here:
Oh, that's great news. I though it was only added in 7.0. I now see it
in 6.5.3. I think in 7.0 we just allowed TEMP as a user column.
For the book, TEMPORARY it is.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-04-06 16:29:57 | Re: Temporary indexes |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-04-06 16:19:09 | Re: 7.1 items |