Re: BIT datatype (Fixed)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BIT datatype (Fixed)
Date: 2000-04-03 20:49:11
Message-ID: 200004032049.QAA17339@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Applied.

> Hi,
>
> here is an updated version of the bit type with a bugfix and all the necessary
> SQL functions defined. This should replace what is currently in contrib. I'd
> appreciate any comments on what is there.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Adriaan

[Attachment, skipping...]

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-04-03 21:07:53 Re: procedure returns a tuple
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-04-03 19:32:51 Re: Should pg_dump refuse to run if DB has different version?