Re: pgAccess change

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgAccess change
Date: 2000-03-31 14:44:20
Message-ID: 200003311444.JAA24711@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Thanks. I'm building a test RPM here so I can satisfy Tom's request for
> > > regress results on CURRENT. My rpm patchset barfed on pgaccess -- so I
> > > investigated. I fixed it in my local tree, but wanted to alert folk.
>
> > Glad you found it. That was the one file I had to modify to get it to
> > match our old version, and obviously I messed that up.
>
> I'm going to take this opportunity to thank Marc for having a cvsweb
> interface -- as I was able to see when the difference was introduced
> using that interface.
>
> Given the number of things you patch, Bruce, it shouldn't surprise
> anyone that an occassional error is introduced -- that's why it's good
> to have many sets of eyes looking at the code. I can only have
> nightmares about how many errors I could cause if I were applying
> patches at that rate... :-)

The problem with pgaccess is that is not a patch I can eyeball. It is a
stand-alone tar file that writes over our files. I am never sure what
is new or old until I see what files show as new, etc.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-03-31 14:45:47 Re: pgAccess change
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-03-31 14:36:30 Re: pgAccess change