Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Date: 2000-03-08 18:58:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 02:29:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm.  Since there have been examples of vacuum analyze <tablename> in
> the numeric regress test since 6.5, I'd think we'd have heard about it
> if there were any widespread problem ;-).  Perhaps it is a platform
> issue, but I suspect you will find there are additional constraints that
> explain why no one but you is seeing it.  Please do dig into it ... or,
> if you do not have time, you could consider giving one of the other
> developers a login on your machine and that person could check it out.

Story so far: I have a table called "found". vacuum() in src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
gets called with vacrel="found". During vc_init() at line 177, vacrel is cleared (="").

More tomorrow...



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-03-08 19:29:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql
Previous:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-03-08 17:19:18
Subject: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group