Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jerome ALET <alet(at)unice(dot)fr>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update
Date: 2000-03-07 23:53:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> I've even received a mail trying to explain me that update and delete are
> the same thing because you can update a record you want to delete but have
> no right to, to change its data... of course this is possible, but
> nevertheless the record isn't deleted, so update and delete really are two
> different things, not to mention you may want to give delete permission
> but not insert nor update.
> As I told previously in private to Bruce, I won't be able to make this
> patch for 7.0 until a week or two, so if someone do it before (please do,
> because you better know postgresql code than me, so you'll make less
> mistakes), just tell me because I don't really want to duplicate the
> effort.
> bye,
> PS: could someone explain me what "tricky" means ?

Tricky means not based on 7.0, and it mucks with the internals, and that
it may require an initdb.

Bruce Momjian |
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-03-07 23:59:53 Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?)
Previous Message JB 2000-03-07 23:53:06 'LIKE' enhancement

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-03-08 01:44:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-03-07 23:24:21 Re: [BUGS] grant/revoke bug with delete/update