Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs

* Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> [000302 03:45] wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > This was discussed a while ago. I thought we had agreed that we needed
> > > to keep two sets of docs on the website, one for the last stable release
> > > (ie, 6.5 currently) and one for the current development tip. But I
> > > guess nothing's been done about it yet...
> >
> > Perhaps we agreed what should be done, but I'm not sure anyone agreed
> > to actually do it.
> >
> > Vince, could you take ownership of this issue (at least to get it on a
> > ToDo list so we don't forget)? I'm happy to help (will probably need
> > to redirect the nightly html production to another area of the web
> > site) but I'm reluctant to muck around with the overall structure of
> > the site, at least without some adult supervision...
>
> Actually I had planned on doing it with the 7.0 release. I have a number
> of website changes to do and things like two sets of docs are considered
> a major change - or at least I consider it one. If you can redirect any
> release docs to the release-doc directory I just created on the website
> that'd help - otherwise it'll hafta wait till 7.0 goes to release.

Having it happen at the 7.0 release would be optimal and most appreciated.

thanks,
-Alfred