| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types |
| Date: | 2000-03-01 19:28:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200003011928.OAA13526@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Possibly I misunderstand the rules we set for beta phase, but my
> > understanding was not so much "no initdbs" as "no new-feature
> > development". This sure looks like it needs some more feature
> > development...
>
> That's how I understood it, as well. It's just that Bruce had (at one
> time) offered to do the intergration/development of this type, and one
> interpretation of what he posted was that he had the code, but hadn't
> integrated it, because of the "no initdb" rule. Since Bruce tends to be
> the man for submissions from non-core developers, I just wanted to make
> sure everyone was on the same page.
No, I have not written the code. I have been pretty busy and did not go
though my mailbox like I normally do before beta time.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-03-01 19:30:14 | SQL92 standard corrections |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 19:23:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types |