Re: bit types

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bit types
Date: 2000-03-01 16:36:52
Message-ID: 200003011636.LAA08033@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce,
>
> The bit-type that is in contrib is useless as it stands. Those are
> only C-routines to implement the functionality, and there are none of
> the SQL functions to actually make these usable. This really needs to be
> integrated with postgres proper. I don't know how to go about this and
> that is why I asked for help. I'm prepared to do whatever SQL function
> definitions are needed, do the regression tests etc. Would it be better
> to go back to the hackers mailing list to ask for help? Has this missed
> 7.0 now? If so, we'd better remove the bit-type from contrib.

I clearly dropped the ball on this one. Don't think it can go into 7.0
because it would require catalog changes/initdb. However, I would like
to keep it in contrib and add it as soon as 7.0 finalizes and we move to
7.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-03-01 16:45:08 Psql and \H option
Previous Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-03-01 16:35:11 Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec?