| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com |
| Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, webmaster(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
| Date: | 2000-02-22 05:33:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20000222143359C.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> "ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT" I view as being a more general
> problem not simply restricted to referential integrity. My comment
> was meant to be strictly interpreted within the realm of RI. Obviously,
> general dropping of columns and constraints needs to be solved, but these
> aren't RI issues specifically.
That's ok, as long as stated somewhere in TODO or whatever.
> And, no, you don't have ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT. What you have
> is the ability to add foreign key constraints only. When this was
This is more than ok:-) Since without ADD CONSTRAINTS, we could not
define a circular referential integrity at all. Good job!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2000-02-22 05:40:25 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-22 05:31:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |