Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, webmaster(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date: 2000-02-22 04:45:39
Message-ID: 20000222134539N.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At 07:57 PM 2/21/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > * -Add referential integrity(Jan)[primary]
>
> This is only PARTIALLY complete:
>
> MATCH FULL and MATCH <unspecified> foreign keys and their related
> referential actions are complete. MATCH PARTIAL isn't in - I'll be
> doing that for 7.1.
>
> It doesn't check that the columns referenced in a foreign key
> form a primary key or are contrained by UNIQUE in the referenced
> table. This will be checked in 7.1, not sure who will do it (who
> ever gets to it first, probably).
>
> Those are the two major user-visible loose ends with this feature.

What about ALTER TABLE table DROP CONSTRAINT? I see this:

alter table t1 drop constraint t1_fk cascade;
ERROR: ALTER TABLE / DROP CONSTRAINT is not implemented

Note that we seem to have ALTER TABLE table ADD CONSTRAINT, though.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-22 04:53:09 Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-'
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-22 04:19:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?