Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
Date: 2000-02-18 04:53:23
Message-ID: 200002180453.XAA04906@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> cannot currently be transformed properly for rules given the info
> available in the existing structures. This is true because there is no
> equivalent query which allows you to specify anything like t1, ta, t2,
> or tb in the target list, and there is no way currently to carry along
> the "tj (n, m)" info.
>
> Comments on any or all?

It makes my head hurt. Is that a comment?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-18 05:09:29 Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-18 04:52:39 Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu