Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC primary keys

From: "Alex Verstak" <averstak(at)vt(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC primary keys
Date: 2000-02-11 07:12:06
Message-ID: 200002110712.CAA95922@averstak.campus.vt.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


Apparently, it was fixed in version 6.5.3 of the driver.
PostgreSQL 6.5.3 has version 6.5.2 of the driver. The 6.5.3
driver is the one in CVS.

Thank you,
Alex Verstak
Virginia Tech


Peter Mount wrote:
> Hmmm, the one in CVS is (it was destined for 6.5.3, but I screwed the
> cvs tagging).
>
> Anyhow, I thought I fixed this in 6.5.1?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Verstak [mailto:averstak(at)vt(dot)edu]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC primary keys
>
>
>
> postgresql.Driver:
> MAJORVERSION = 6
> MINORVERSION = 5
>
> This is the one included with PostgreSQL 6.5.3. What/where is the
> latest stable version of the JDBC driver?
>
> Thank you,
> Alex Verstak
> Virginia Tech

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak - Zakkr 2000-02-11 10:34:52 Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2000-02-11 07:11:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions