From: | "Alex Verstak" <averstak(at)vt(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC primary keys |
Date: | 2000-02-11 07:12:06 |
Message-ID: | 200002110712.CAA95922@averstak.campus.vt.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Apparently, it was fixed in version 6.5.3 of the driver.
PostgreSQL 6.5.3 has version 6.5.2 of the driver. The 6.5.3
driver is the one in CVS.
Thank you,
Alex Verstak
Virginia Tech
Peter Mount wrote:
> Hmmm, the one in CVS is (it was destined for 6.5.3, but I screwed the
> cvs tagging).
>
> Anyhow, I thought I fixed this in 6.5.1?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Verstak [mailto:averstak(at)vt(dot)edu]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC primary keys
>
>
>
> postgresql.Driver:
> MAJORVERSION = 6
> MINORVERSION = 5
>
> This is the one included with PostgreSQL 6.5.3. What/where is the
> latest stable version of the JDBC driver?
>
> Thank you,
> Alex Verstak
> Virginia Tech
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak - Zakkr | 2000-02-11 10:34:52 | Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions |
Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2000-02-11 07:11:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions |