Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS
Date: 2000-01-31 01:11:14
Message-ID: 200001310111.UAA22887@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > I thought that the original berkeley doco covered this to some extent.
> >
> > Where would I find that?
>
> No offence intended guys, but I'm a bit shocked that you're all hacking
> on
> postgres without having read the design docs. The design docs are
> extremely cool and I'd personally like to see the database return
> to the glory days of all this cool technology, features and ideas.
> (Hey wouldn't even mind if it went back to postquel hey hey :)

Suppy and demand. We little demand for fancy features, and huge demand
for SQL standard features.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-31 01:52:22 Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-01-31 01:08:13 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th)