From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John Brothers <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Date: | 2000-01-28 17:19:38 |
Message-ID: | 200001281719.MAA28643@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Hiroshi neglected to mention that you'd probably need to drop and
> >> recreate the index after applying the patch; if it's indeed out of
> >> order, just patching the comparator bug isn't enough to fix it.
>
> > Does Hiroshi's patch get applied?
>
> Now that I understand the problem, yes, his patch is good as far as
> it goes. There are probably other places with the same problem...
Applied.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | davidb | 2000-01-28 19:41:52 | How to handle non-postgres questions? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-28 17:19:11 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-28 17:26:02 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-28 17:19:11 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolas Huillard | 2000-01-28 21:41:43 | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-28 17:19:11 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |