Re: [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump
Date: 2016-06-16 13:05:34
Message-ID: 1ffaed09-e01b-acf9-3d04-a519f516240f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

El 16/06/16 a las 09:48, Michael Paquier escribió:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> This problem came up due to a difference between pg_dump on 9.1.12 and
>> 9.1.22 (I believe it was due to a patch on pg_dump that excluded the
>> dependent objects from being dumped), but here I'm using 9.5.3:
>
> Hm. I don't recall anything in pg_dump lately except ebd092b, but that
> fixed another class of problems.

I believe it was this one:

commit 5108013dbbfedb5e5af6a58cde5f074d895c46bf
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: Wed Jan 13 18:55:27 2016 -0500

Handle extension members when first setting object dump flags in
pg_dump.

Regards,

--
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2016-06-16 13:29:15 Re: regarding schema only migration from sqlserver to postgres with runmtk.sh
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-16 12:48:55 Re: [GENERAL] PgQ and pg_dump

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-06-16 13:15:28 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-16 13:03:13 Re: forcing a rebuild of the visibility map