Re: Correct docs about partitions and EXCLUDE constraints

From: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct docs about partitions and EXCLUDE constraints
Date: 2025-06-19 19:09:47
Message-ID: 1fcbd87d-2f82-41af-8d8e-caf48d7cc1ef@illuminatedcomputing.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/19/25 08:43, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Leaving it in the entry for PARTITION BY seems out of place; shouldn't
> it be moved to the entry for EXCLUDE? I also merged your wording with
> some similar wording from the entry about UNIQUE. Attached.

I agree this new location makes more sense. The wording looks good.

Thanks!

--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Salvatore Dipietro 2025-06-19 19:10:52 Re: Remove Instruction Synchronization Barrier in spin_delay() for ARM64 architecture
Previous Message Thom Brown 2025-06-19 18:55:43 Re: Add CASEFOLD() function.