From: | Dave Clements <dclements89(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Help required on query performance |
Date: | 2010-02-01 01:22:13 |
Message-ID: | 1f30b80c1001311722y5f410655nf3fec0091dc2912c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
After doing an analyze on the database, it improved a lot :)
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Clements <dclements89(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I did the re-analyze serveral times, using the command:
>>
>> ANALYZE tablename;
>>
>> Is there any other command as well or another way to do that?
>
> It's important that the stats target get increased as well, it looks
> like you're not getting enough buckets to get a good estimate of rows
> to be returned for various conditions.
>
> # show default_statistics_target ;
> default_statistics_target
> ---------------------------
> 10
>
> # alter database smarlowe set default_statistics_target=200;
> ALTER DATABASE
> # analyze;
>
> Then run the explain analyze again and see if your row estimates are
> closer and if the plan changes.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-01 03:32:20 | Re: Fwd: Help required on query performance |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-02-01 01:13:33 | Re: Fwd: Help required on query performance |