| From: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit | 
| Date: | 2020-11-23 16:27:18 | 
| Message-ID: | 1f29ad3f1d8b969dfde6d500bbd9d82d@postgrespro.ru | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi,
On 2020-11-23 09:48, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>> 
>> Here is how I'm making 4 separate patches:
>> 
>> 1. new function and it's documentation.
>> 2. GUC and it's documentation.
>> 3. server level option and it's documentation.
>> 4. test cases for all of the above patches.
>> 
> 
> Hi, I'm attaching the patches here. Note that, though the code changes
> for this feature are small, I divided them up as separate patches to
> make review easy.
> 
> v1-0001-postgres_fdw-function-to-discard-cached-connections.patch
> 
This patch looks pretty straightforward for me, but there are some 
things to be addressed IMO:
+		server = GetForeignServerByName(servername, true);
+
+		if (server != NULL)
+		{
Yes, you return a false if no server was found, but for me it worth 
throwing an error in this case as, for example, dblink does in the 
dblink_disconnect().
+ result = disconnect_cached_connections(FOREIGNSERVEROID,
+	 hashvalue,
+	 false);
+		if (all || (!all && cacheid == FOREIGNSERVEROID &&
+			entry->server_hashvalue == hashvalue))
+		{
+			if (entry->conn != NULL &&
+				!all && cacheid == FOREIGNSERVEROID &&
+				entry->server_hashvalue == hashvalue)
These conditions look bulky for me. First, you pass FOREIGNSERVEROID to 
disconnect_cached_connections(), but actually it just duplicates 'all' 
flag, since when it is 'FOREIGNSERVEROID', then 'all == false'; when it 
is '-1', then 'all == true'. That is all, there are only two calls of 
disconnect_cached_connections(). That way, it seems that we should keep 
only 'all' flag at least for now, doesn't it?
Second, I think that we should just rewrite this if statement in order 
to simplify it and make more readable, e.g.:
	if ((all || entry->server_hashvalue == hashvalue) &&
		entry->conn != NULL)
	{
		disconnect_pg_server(entry);
		result = true;
	}
+	if (all)
+	{
+		hash_destroy(ConnectionHash);
+		ConnectionHash = NULL;
+		result = true;
+	}
Also, I am still not sure that it is a good idea to destroy the whole 
cache even in 'all' case, but maybe others will have a different 
opinion.
> 
> v1-0002-postgres_fdw-add-keep_connections-GUC-to-not-cache-connections.patch
> 
+			entry->changing_xact_state) ||
+			(entry->used_in_current_xact &&
+			!keep_connections))
I am not sure, but I think, that instead of adding this additional flag 
into ConnCacheEntry structure we can look on entry->xact_depth and use 
local:
bool used_in_current_xact = entry->xact_depth > 0;
for exactly the same purpose. Since we set entry->xact_depth to zero at 
the end of xact, then it was used if it is not zero. It is set to 1 by 
begin_remote_xact() called by GetConnection(), so everything seems to be 
fine.
Otherwise, both patches seem to be working as expected. I am going to 
have a look on the last two patches a bit later.
Regards
-- 
Alexey Kondratov
Postgres Professional https://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grigory Smolkin | 2020-11-23 16:37:36 | Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL | 
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-23 16:24:30 | Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" |