| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pritam Baral <pritam(at)pritambaral(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index usage for elem-contained-by-const-range clauses |
| Date: | 2017-03-28 14:03:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1eccb242-bf07-f417-0c97-1bb2d643fbeb@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/24/17 10:50 AM, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Pritam,
>
> On 3/17/17 5:41 PM, Pritam Baral wrote:
>>
>> So sorry. I'm attaching the correct version of the original with this,
>> in case you want to test the limited implementation, because I still
>> have to go through Tom's list of suggestions.
>>
>> BTW, the patch is for applying on top of REL9_6_2, and while I
>> suspect it may work on master too, I haven't tested it since the
>> original submission (Feb 23).
>>
>>> Also, I noticed that patch haven't regression tests. Some mention of
>>> this optimization in docs is also nice to have. > > ------ >
>>> Alexander Korotkov > Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
>>> > The Russian Postgres Company
>
> This thread has been idle for a week. Please respond and/or post a new
> patch by 2017-03-28 00:00 AoE (UTC-12) or this submission will be marked
> "Returned with Feedback".
This submission has been marked "Returned with Feedback". Please feel
free to resubmit to a future commitfest.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-03-28 14:17:10 | Re: Monitoring roles patch |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-28 13:34:50 | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |