Re: Error building for 64-bit Windows (10)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Brian Ye <brian(dot)y(dot)ye(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Error building for 64-bit Windows (10)
Date: 2021-05-19 14:56:23
Message-ID: 1e23ace9-b46e-eb94-019c-225d62266a72@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


On 5/18/21 8:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:15:35AM -0500, Brian Ye wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> Yes I also saw that after installing 64-bit, the 32-bit "bin" and "include"
>> directories were removed.
>> I think the content of the "include" are common for both 32- and 64-bit.
>> Windows can run both 32-bit and
>> 64-bit binaries so removing these 2 directories is probably okay. Just my
>> guess.
>> Again, thanks!
>> Brian Ye
> hamerkop is the only buildfarm member testing krb5 builds with MSVC on
> Windows. The path used in this case is c:\Program Files\MIT\Kerberos\
> so the patch of this thread is going to break the builds there if this
> relies on "inc/" for the include path. Is this the original include
> folder used for this installation of krb5?
>

I have no idea - it's not my animal. Maybe ask the owner
<buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

I guess maybe I should look at adding kerberos to one of the animals I
do control.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2021-05-19 16:53:49 Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-05-19 14:31:35 Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync