Re: bulk typos

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bulk typos
Date: 2018-04-01 21:11:27
Message-ID: 1e0471df-2fea-23d0-db89-31bcd9c9b48b@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/04/18 07:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix_GERZAGUET?= <felix(dot)gerzaguet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> I needed another distraction so bulk-checked for typos, limited to
>>> comments in *.[ch].
>> I think you introduced another one while changing "explcitly" to
>> "expilcitly" instead of "explicitly" :-)
> LGTM for the most part, except for this change:
>
> - * Therefore, we do not whinge about no-such-process.
> + * Therefore, we do not whine about no-such-process.
>
> I think that spelling is intentional, so I didn't change it.
> Pushed the rest, with Felix's correction.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Me thinks some people are Whinging far too much!

see: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/whinge

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2018-04-01 21:11:43 Re: [HACKERS] Insert values() per-statement overhead
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-04-01 20:10:32 Re: Optimizing nested ConvertRowtypeExpr execution