Yet another "drop table vs delete" question

From: marek(dot)patrzek(at)gmail(dot)com
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Yet another "drop table vs delete" question
Date: 2009-04-21 17:26:24
Message-ID: 1df90e99-0a4f-461b-80b1-1daa3b111360@c12g2000yqc.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I was wondering if dropping a table is more efficient in PostgreSQL
8.x in comparison to deleting it's content ?

To put you in the picture - I want to schedule via cron job some daily
data materialization. With the resource I got there are only those two
ways:

1) DROP statement:
a) DROP TABLE tmp;
b) CREATE TABLE tmp AS select * from ....;

2) DELETE statement:
a) DELETE FROM tmp;
b) INSERT INTO tmp SELECT * from ....;

tmp table doesn't have any index nor constraints.

The thing is, postgresql may leave some invalid content behind in both
situations. The real question is - which of those two options leaves
less garbage to be vaccumed ? At this point I don't relay care about
cost based efficiency but cutting down pg background work.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Morton 2009-04-21 17:32:36 Re: round behavior differs between 8.1.5 and 8.3.7
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-21 17:13:38 Re: trouble with to_char('L')