Re: bugfix: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter - "invalid input syntax for type boolean"

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bugfix: BUG #15477: Procedure call with named inout refcursor parameter - "invalid input syntax for type boolean"
Date: 2018-11-02 08:02:47
Message-ID: 1d846492-3822-616b-7246-91b429cc5dbb@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/11/2018 06:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> čt 1. 11. 2018 v 14:31 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>> napsal:
>
> Cleaned patch with regress tests
>
>
> minor cleaning

Could you explain your analysis of the problem and how this patch
proposes to fix it?

About the patch, I suspect printing out

NOTICE: <unnamed portal 2>

in the regression tests might lead to unstable results if there is
concurrent activity.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-11-02 08:04:27 Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-02 07:39:22 Re: CF app feature request