Re: Bitmap Indexes patch (was Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback)

From: "Vladimir Sitnikov" <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Gianni Ciolli" <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Gabriele Bartolini" <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
Subject: Re: Bitmap Indexes patch (was Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback)
Date: 2008-11-04 00:18:47
Message-ID: 1d709ecc0811031618x11e68497ob582821c761a765@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

BTW: is there a framework to test recovery related features?
The only idea I could take from the top of my head is to comment out all the
page writes and leave only WAL logging. Then crash database at random and
verify if the index still performs as expected.

Regards,
Vladimir Sitnikov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-04 00:26:47 Re: [SQL] reliable lock inside stored procedure (SOLVED)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-11-04 00:12:29 Re: Bitmap Indexes patch (was Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback)