Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date: 2018-08-21 18:09:15
Message-ID: 1d5946a3-aa85-a3ec-c8aa-b3e9b66dd5d9@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
> XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are not
> able to build anything after release 10.

I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft hasn't
supported it in 4 years.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-21 18:10:05 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-21 18:06:18 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-08-21 18:10:05 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-08-21 18:06:18 Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)